I'm in the process of creating a short, three-part primer on relational and conversational principles. In this first entry, we look at the vital role "No" plays in the health of our relationships:
Principles of Productive Discourse, Part 1:
Saying yes to "no"
One of the most important insights into healthy relationships was given to me by a mentor I had in college. “One of the hallmarks of a healthy relationship is the ability to give and receive the word ‘no,’” he told me. Over a decade later, this insight still informs how I engage in building and sustaining healthy relationships, be it with my wife, family, coworkers, or anyone in between.
This sounds simple enough. But like patience, kindness, and many other foundational principles, it’s also easy to forget. Additionally, the importance of “no” is something we just don’t spend much time on. Outside of a decades-old anti-drug campaign, and the recent public conversation around the grossly-neglected topic of consent, what it means to say or hear “no” is something that seems to escape our collective consciousness. Why is that?
Before moving on, some clarification would probably be helpful. I am only referring to what “no” means in the context of personal relationships, and the expression of one’s own desires, feelings, thoughts, and beliefs. That’s it. This is not about political debate or policymaking, though it may certainly inform those things.
In order to understand the importance of communicating “no,” we must first understand exactly what it means from a philosophical standpoint. Examined outside of specific circumstances, “no” communicates separation, difference, and independence. Hearing “no” means the subconscious realization that perspectives exist outside of your own. Accepting “no” means recognizing your perspective or opinion is not the only one in existence. Accepting “no” also invites the uncomfortable feeling that you might be agreeing to something that you do not believe, when in reality you are merely acknowledging its right to exist.
Consider the opposite, a relationship where you do not feel free to say “no.” One telltale sign of an emotionally abusive relationship is the constant attention to words and actions, also known as “walking on eggshells,” so as to never rouse and anger or disapproval of the abuser. In other words, the victim lacks the freedom to be a distinct person. They can’t say “no.”
The astounding similarities between being with abusive partners and being in an abusive ideological structure is one I’ll cover in future articles, as there’s an important distinction to be made. One can absorb the abusive tenets of their ideological surroundings, without themselves intending to engage in abusive behavior with others. As I said earlier, this is about individuals in their one-on-one relationships, regardless of where the behaviors originated. And the point is, being unable to give or receive “no” is one of many signs that the relationship has turned toxic.
Here are a few questions to ask yourself in order to gauge your relational health in this area. Consider these questions within the context of your various relationships, be them friends, family, coworkers, loved ones, and the like:
Giving “No”-
Do I feel comfortable expressing disagreement with this person, or do I feel strong pressure to agree with them when presented with the choice?
Do I feel this person would accept my disagreement, should I offer it? Why or why not? Are there previous interactions I can draw on to substantiate this belief?
Do I get a sense of anxiety prior to interactions when I might be asked to offer a thought, opinion, or preference?
Do I feel comfortable being a distinct person within the context of this relationship, or do I feel the urgent need to discover and conform to their standards?
Is my disagreement generally met with respect, or with hostility?
Receiving “No”-
How do I respond to disagreement? Do I welcome it, or see it as a personal challenge?
Does my general attitude towards differing opinions give those around me the space to disagree? If unsure, how could I find out?
How readily am I to admit that I am wrong? Am I quick to apologize? How does the answer to these questions impact the actions of those around me?
When was the last time a close relationship challenged or disagreed with me? If it has been a while, what are the implications of that?
These are all important questions to ask, not only to evaluate the health of our different relationships, but to see how we might be creating a toxic environment ourselves. Clinical psychologist and professor Suzanne Philips puts it like this: “If a NO is punished with silence, retaliation or loss of connection, there really are no options to say or hear NO. It is not a point of difference; it is a point of control and relationship loss.” This is correct. We can not and will not ever have a true relationship without the ability to freely and respectfully tell the other person “no.”
Next time: How to argue like a white supremacist.
While driving yesterday, I had an idea to help facilitate more regular content creation, especially during this time when it is all but impossible to make videos outside of livestreams from my phone. The idea is that of a biweekly post that roughly takes the form of a newsletter, of which this is shall be the first volume. As an aside, evidently a synonym for biweekly is 'fortnightly,' which I'd totally use if it weren't for the association with a game of stupid dances.
My current plan for the format is as follows, though obviously this is likely to change.
-Introduction, brief life updates, and maybe a thought or two I've had lately that I wanted to share with you.
-What books I have been going through, and any excerpts or takeaways I feel are worth sharing.
-Any other noteworthy podcasts or media I've consumed lately.
-What stories I'm paying attention to (if any) and why
-Any questions I might have for you guys
-?
Alright, it's called TL;DR for a reason. Let's jump in.
As I mentioned earlier, we have Covid again. I'm not going to ...
I know it's been quiet here lately. I'll eventually explain what's been going on with my personal life (most of it has been a mixture of our new baby being really, really difficult, and perpetual sickness. For example, last week three our of the four of us had to go to the hospital) but this is what has consumed virtually all free time outside of work and family time.
Please consider helping us bring justice to these bastards. Their indifference and complicity in the harm done to these kids has to stop. Please help us make that happen.
For those who missed it, here's an open letter I wrote to my community last fall after the suicide of a former student, himself a victim of this school district:
https://returntoreason.medium.com/an-open-letter-to-the-citizens-of-albany-county-ca507fa24cd8
Thank you for everything you do. You guys are awesome, and I look forward to filling you in on what's been going on in the near future. See you soon.
ps- I will be...
Salutations! I hope you all had a fantastic Christmas. Here is my list of top ten the things I learned/conclusions I reached from this past year. Some are directly related to events, others are not. Either way, I tried my best to create a list of useful ideas for you to incorporate into your view of the present moment. I hope you find this list useful, as many of the items on it are lenses I find incredibly important for understanding the world around me. As always, I welcome any feedback you might have!
In Part 2, I use Conquest's Three Laws of Politics to expand on my specific critiques of Peterson's Manifesto, and flush out some of my own axioms that I failed to explain in Part 1. This is where I get into the nuts and bolts of how institutions deviate from their original purpose and begin to generate and pursue their own interests.
What began as a singular episode critiquing one of my intellectual heroes has turned into a multi-part series going after some foundational axioms of mainstream Conservatism.
In this introductions, I discuss Permanent Washington and the concept of accountability, and sew the seeds for what's to come in either trusting or rejecting many mainstream Western institutions.
It's worth mentioning that this recording, along with every other part in this series, has taken almost (in some cases more than) a day to upload. I have no idea why my internet is failing me as hard as it is, but here we are. Hopefully you find these recordings in time to assist you in your vote tomorrow 🤙
I've been wanting to do this for a while. It might have taken me two days to figure out how to get this from my phone to my computer, but I finally got it to work.
On Saturday, I used the voice recorder app on my phone to record a podcast covering Karl Schmitt, his discussions of power, and how we can map this onto our contemporary situation with The Regime that runs our country, and the Bureaucratic State which does its ideological bidding.
After listening to it, I realize there is some more context I need to add to the ending, so I might record another one tomorrow or Wednesday. Either way, it feels good to be recording stuff again. As always, I welcome your thoughts and feedback!
"We don't know where this thing isn't."
-Bret Weinstein
@JamesDerian suggested I pin and regularly update a thread of sources I'm compiling to illustrate the total societal takeover of Far-Left Orthodoxy, including their explicit targeting of our kids for indoctrination. Here is that thread.
Compromised entities:
Nickelodeon
Cartoon Network
Kellogg's Cereal
Mattel Toys
Lego
Sesame Street (SESAME STREET 🤦♂️)
PBS
CNN
The New York Times
The Washington Post
NPR
NBC News
Gender/Sexuality
Cartoon Network celebrating transgender children:
https://twitter.com/stage13network/status/1377332951659151360?s=20
More Cartoon Network trans stuff:
https://twitter.com/cartoonnetwork/status/1377259794294259717?s=20
Cartoon Network on "normalizing gender pronouns"
https://twitter.com/cartoonnetwork/status/1338539346530537475?s=20
Lego released "rainbow set" for Pride Month:
https://www.lego.com/en-us/aboutus/news/2021/may/everyone-is-awesome/
"Queer up your morning routine" with Kellogg's new cereal featuring edible glitter, ...